Comments on: Bring back STX and ETX http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2006/12/30/bring-back-stx-and-etx/ Coding under the close supervision of cats Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:05:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: jpc http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2006/12/30/bring-back-stx-and-etx/#comment-7314 jpc Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:31:36 +0000 http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2006/12/30/bring-back-stx-and-etx/#comment-7314 If you want to use smart software why bother with codings that are not 8-bit clean? Just use netstrings[1] everywhere? [1] http://cr.yp.to/proto/netstrings.txt If you want to use smart software why bother with codings that are not 8-bit clean? Just use netstrings[1] everywhere?

[1] http://cr.yp.to/proto/netstrings.txt

]]> By: Domain of the Bored » Blog Archive » Patches for WP-Cache http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2006/12/30/bring-back-stx-and-etx/#comment-558 Domain of the Bored » Blog Archive » Patches for WP-Cache Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:48:23 +0000 http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2006/12/30/bring-back-stx-and-etx/#comment-558 [...] I use the WP-Cache plug-in here on the blog in case that anything I post here should get dugg/linked-listed/reddited/etc. Over on Jeff Johnson’s blog, Scott Stevenson says: … Vienna … seems to get confused on these: [...] [...] I use the WP-Cache plug-in here on the blog in case that anything I post here should get dugg/linked-listed/reddited/etc. Over on Jeff Johnson’s blog, Scott Stevenson says: … Vienna … seems to get confused on these: [...]

]]> By: Peter Hosey http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2006/12/30/bring-back-stx-and-etx/#comment-547 Peter Hosey Sat, 30 Dec 2006 23:53:18 +0000 http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2006/12/30/bring-back-stx-and-etx/#comment-547 And for a lightweight database format, I recommend using the FS and RS characters (field and record separator). And for a lightweight database format, I recommend using the FS and RS characters (field and record separator).

]]> By: Jeff http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2006/12/30/bring-back-stx-and-etx/#comment-544 Jeff Sat, 30 Dec 2006 22:18:34 +0000 http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2006/12/30/bring-back-stx-and-etx/#comment-544 <p>Scott, I can't reproduce the problem on my machine. Perhaps we could continue the conversation <a href="http://forums.cocoaforge.com/viewforum.php?f=18" title="Vienna General forum" rel="nofollow">here</a>. :-)</p> Scott, I can’t reproduce the problem on my machine. Perhaps we could continue the conversation here. :-)

]]> By: Scott Stevenson http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2006/12/30/bring-back-stx-and-etx/#comment-543 Scott Stevenson Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:37:04 +0000 http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2006/12/30/bring-back-stx-and-etx/#comment-543 Speaking of parsing, Vienna 2.1.0.2108.218.21.1.21.8.21.821 can't seems to get confused on these: feed://gigliwood.com/weblog/?flav=rss feed://mikezornek.com/feed/ feed://boredzo.org/blog/feed/atom/ In all three cases I can see article titles but not the actual article contents. Safari displays all three correctly. Because I know you love getting bug reports on your blog. Speaking of parsing, Vienna 2.1.0.2108.218.21.1.21.8.21.821 can’t seems to get confused on these:

feed://gigliwood.com/weblog/?flav=rss
feed://mikezornek.com/feed/
feed://boredzo.org/blog/feed/atom/

In all three cases I can see article titles but not the actual article contents. Safari displays all three correctly.

Because I know you love getting bug reports on your blog.

]]>