<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What about Sony?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2008/11/02/what-about-sony/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2008/11/02/what-about-sony/</link>
	<description>Coding under the close supervision of cats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:22:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ned Holbrook</title>
		<link>http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2008/11/02/what-about-sony/comment-page-1/#comment-9956</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned Holbrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/?p=107#comment-9956</guid>
		<description>FWIW, the CD &quot;longbox&quot; was originally designed so retailers could repurpose their existing record bins by simply adding a divider, in which case a row of record storage could become two rows of CDs. It&#039;s the same idea as making DVD cases the same height as VHS cassettes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, the CD &#8220;longbox&#8221; was originally designed so retailers could repurpose their existing record bins by simply adding a divider, in which case a row of record storage could become two rows of CDs. It&#8217;s the same idea as making DVD cases the same height as VHS cassettes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Daniel</title>
		<link>http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2008/11/02/what-about-sony/comment-page-1/#comment-9368</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/?p=107#comment-9368</guid>
		<description>I think you can workaround this problem using the gpt terminal command top manually create your partition table.
I didn&#039;t try as the last time I decided to format a drive using GPT, it was for my linux box and I did it using gnu parted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you can workaround this problem using the gpt terminal command top manually create your partition table.<br />
I didn&#8217;t try as the last time I decided to format a drive using GPT, it was for my linux box and I did it using gnu parted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2008/11/02/what-about-sony/comment-page-1/#comment-9362</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 03:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/?p=107#comment-9362</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m assuming the stuff on the back is there because of the size of the package, rather than causing it. All this could have easily been printed on a piece of very thin, folded paper stuck in with the device.

I&#039;d guess that this is more a theft prevention issue, as well as a way to get more visual presence on the shelf. These were the two issues initially with CD long-boxes I believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m assuming the stuff on the back is there because of the size of the package, rather than causing it. All this could have easily been printed on a piece of very thin, folded paper stuck in with the device.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d guess that this is more a theft prevention issue, as well as a way to get more visual presence on the shelf. These were the two issues initially with CD long-boxes I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ölbaum</title>
		<link>http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2008/11/02/what-about-sony/comment-page-1/#comment-9357</link>
		<dc:creator>Ölbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 18:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/?p=107#comment-9357</guid>
		<description>And about the packaging: they&#039;re a PITA and a SPOC. From now on, whenever I buy something in such a package, I will ask the cashier or at the customer support desk that they open it for me (less injuries and less trash for me).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And about the packaging: they&#8217;re a PITA and a SPOC. From now on, whenever I buy something in such a package, I will ask the cashier or at the customer support desk that they open it for me (less injuries and less trash for me).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ölbaum</title>
		<link>http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2008/11/02/what-about-sony/comment-page-1/#comment-9356</link>
		<dc:creator>Ölbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 18:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/?p=107#comment-9356</guid>
		<description>Computers count a kilobyte as 1024 bytes. It&#039;s convenient since they use powers of two. But legally, a kilo is 1000. So 8 GB is 8 x 10^9 bytes, but the computer will see it as 7.45 x 1024 x 1024 x 1024 bytes.

Recently, new units were introduced to try and lift this confusion. The kibibyte (kiB, 1024 bytes), mebibyte (MiB, 1024 x 1024 bytes) and gibibyte (GiB, 1024 x 1024 x 1024 bytes). So drive manufacturers use Gigabytes because it makes the number bigger and OSes use Gibibytes, but display them as GB instead of GiB because it&#039;s what people have been using for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Computers count a kilobyte as 1024 bytes. It&#8217;s convenient since they use powers of two. But legally, a kilo is 1000. So 8 GB is 8 x 10^9 bytes, but the computer will see it as 7.45 x 1024 x 1024 x 1024 bytes.</p>
<p>Recently, new units were introduced to try and lift this confusion. The kibibyte (kiB, 1024 bytes), mebibyte (MiB, 1024 x 1024 bytes) and gibibyte (GiB, 1024 x 1024 x 1024 bytes). So drive manufacturers use Gigabytes because it makes the number bigger and OSes use Gibibytes, but display them as GB instead of GiB because it&#8217;s what people have been using for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
