<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: dSYM in your bundle or just happy to see me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2009/01/20/dsym-in-your-bundle-or-just-happy-to-see-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2009/01/20/dsym-in-your-bundle-or-just-happy-to-see-me/</link>
	<description>Coding under the close supervision of cats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:22:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2009/01/20/dsym-in-your-bundle-or-just-happy-to-see-me/comment-page-1/#comment-9626</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/?p=111#comment-9626</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Eric, yes. They work for food.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rob, it depends on what you mean. On the logistical side, this is to be done for debugging only, not for the &#039;GM&#039; of the app. On the technical side, stripping has very different implications for DWARF than for STABS. As I discussed in my earlier post, DWARF symbols are not put in the executable itself. The executable only contains references to the intermediate object files. Thus, stripping merely removes those references, not the debugging symbols, which were never there to be stripped.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, yes. They work for food.</p>
<p>Rob, it depends on what you mean. On the logistical side, this is to be done for debugging only, not for the &#8216;GM&#8217; of the app. On the technical side, stripping has very different implications for DWARF than for STABS. As I discussed in my earlier post, DWARF symbols are not put in the executable itself. The executable only contains references to the intermediate object files. Thus, stripping merely removes those references, not the debugging symbols, which were never there to be stripped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Keniger</title>
		<link>http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2009/01/20/dsym-in-your-bundle-or-just-happy-to-see-me/comment-page-1/#comment-9623</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Keniger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/?p=111#comment-9623</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t shipping the symbols file with the app defeat the whole purpose of stripping the symbols in the first place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t shipping the symbols file with the app defeat the whole purpose of stripping the symbols in the first place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/2009/01/20/dsym-in-your-bundle-or-just-happy-to-see-me/comment-page-1/#comment-9622</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lapcatsoftware.com/blog/?p=111#comment-9622</guid>
		<description>Geez this was hard to follow, did the cats write it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez this was hard to follow, did the cats write it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
